02 May 2006

Russian Energy Policy - Part 1.0

The caveat emptor issue;

Last week's papers were full of Rosneft and GAZP stories.  Most, including a large portion of Soros' op ed  in the FT, were gash.  Rosneft's IPO has nothing to do with energy security - whether F&C participates in the IPO will have little to do Russia's energy policy.  I also have little issue with investors buying in to a company whose largest producing asset was procured from somewhere else.  After all investors swallowed their concerns once before over a company called Yuganskneftegas - anyone remember a guy called Kenneth Dart?  Investors believe that ethics is a county to the east of London (it's a bad British joke) - at least while the stock is appreciating.  As the leader from the UK's Sunday Times points out greed will overcome fear.  The Russian government knows and understands greed and the cynicism that is required to hold your nose and invest other peoples money.

The real issue is what is an investor buying?  I posted on this previously and nothing that has happened or will happen in the near future will change my mind.  The only impact buyers of Rosneft shares (I can't bring myself to calling them investors) can have on Rosneft's management will be selling or lending the stock to be shorted.  Which will coincide with a drop in the price of oil (and gas) and will not be immediately attributable to management.  So buy if it makes financial sense - just have some shame when the beast turns round and bites you.

I think that this post from Seeking Alpha pretty much sums up how non-Russia related investors view Rosneft.  They may be wrong but don't argue against flow of funds.

Russian Oil: Yukos and Rosneft (YUKOY):

Roger Nusbaum submits: In a big picture sense, oil from Russia is important because there is a lot of it in the ground and in the next few years it looks as though there will be more of that oil being processed and put onto the market for consumption.

That is the simple part. The rest is where it gets progressively more complicated.

Regardless of your opinion about the entire Yukos/Khodorkovsky affair, I have never heard any dispute that Khodorkovsky was told, as were all the oligarchs, to stay out of politics and he did not. I am in no way opining as to whether he should or should not have made comments or anything else and it is possible that what I say is not in dispute is in fact in dispute. I am just trying to relay the facts as I understand them, and I may have facts about Khodorkovsky incorrect but I have seen and read enough coverage that I think I this right.

The fallout of the Khodorkovsky affair was that Yukos was shut down and the assets were later put up for auction. Again, there was politics and controversy surrounding the manner in which this occurred and I don’t want to turn this post into a debate of the politics of it.

The emerging company from all of this with the old Yukos assets is Rosneft. Rosneft is going to have an IPO and July is a possible date for the listing, which is likely to be on the London Stock Exchange. I would like to learn more than what little I know now, but I am interested in the company.

Some of the numbers, if true, are compelling. Earnings in 2005 were $3.9 billion vs $0.8 billion 2004. Revenue was $23.9 billion vs $5.3 billion in 2004. In 2005 the company reduced its debt by $1.7 billion down to $10.9 billion.

I would not get too excited about the growth built into those numbers because the old Yukos’ operations were severely hampered in 2004 and so the company did not do a lot that year.

Some other fun facts about Rosneft include, among Russian companies, it is 2nd in gas production, 8th in oil production, 7th in reserves, and first for oil refining capacity. With the IPO, the company plans to sell 1/3 of the company for about $20 billion. As the company is now state owned, I presume the 2/3rds not sold will be held by the government and possibly sold later.

A lot of people assign a risk to Russian shares because of the Yukos affair. While I certainly cannot say it won’t happen again I think it makes sense to believe that the Russian government does not want it to happen again. A second company being dismantled would probably cause a huge flight of foreign capital, much worse than Yukos. The country, I believe, wants to be a capitalist country with foreign investment.

It’s fair to say they are still learning about capitalism, but anything they do that jeopardizes foreign investment into the country is counter to their own interests. And it is worth pointing out that there are plenty of Russian companies traded on foreign exchanges in the US and in Europe.

Russia wants to be more important in the world economy — not less. Between now and the listing date there will be a lot more to read about Rosneft before making any kind of decision.


[composed and posted with
ecto]


Technorati Tags: , , ,

No comments:

02 May 2006

Russian Energy Policy - Part 1.0

The caveat emptor issue;

Last week's papers were full of Rosneft and GAZP stories.  Most, including a large portion of Soros' op ed  in the FT, were gash.  Rosneft's IPO has nothing to do with energy security - whether F&C participates in the IPO will have little to do Russia's energy policy.  I also have little issue with investors buying in to a company whose largest producing asset was procured from somewhere else.  After all investors swallowed their concerns once before over a company called Yuganskneftegas - anyone remember a guy called Kenneth Dart?  Investors believe that ethics is a county to the east of London (it's a bad British joke) - at least while the stock is appreciating.  As the leader from the UK's Sunday Times points out greed will overcome fear.  The Russian government knows and understands greed and the cynicism that is required to hold your nose and invest other peoples money.

The real issue is what is an investor buying?  I posted on this previously and nothing that has happened or will happen in the near future will change my mind.  The only impact buyers of Rosneft shares (I can't bring myself to calling them investors) can have on Rosneft's management will be selling or lending the stock to be shorted.  Which will coincide with a drop in the price of oil (and gas) and will not be immediately attributable to management.  So buy if it makes financial sense - just have some shame when the beast turns round and bites you.

I think that this post from Seeking Alpha pretty much sums up how non-Russia related investors view Rosneft.  They may be wrong but don't argue against flow of funds.

Russian Oil: Yukos and Rosneft (YUKOY):

Roger Nusbaum submits: In a big picture sense, oil from Russia is important because there is a lot of it in the ground and in the next few years it looks as though there will be more of that oil being processed and put onto the market for consumption.

That is the simple part. The rest is where it gets progressively more complicated.

Regardless of your opinion about the entire Yukos/Khodorkovsky affair, I have never heard any dispute that Khodorkovsky was told, as were all the oligarchs, to stay out of politics and he did not. I am in no way opining as to whether he should or should not have made comments or anything else and it is possible that what I say is not in dispute is in fact in dispute. I am just trying to relay the facts as I understand them, and I may have facts about Khodorkovsky incorrect but I have seen and read enough coverage that I think I this right.

The fallout of the Khodorkovsky affair was that Yukos was shut down and the assets were later put up for auction. Again, there was politics and controversy surrounding the manner in which this occurred and I don’t want to turn this post into a debate of the politics of it.

The emerging company from all of this with the old Yukos assets is Rosneft. Rosneft is going to have an IPO and July is a possible date for the listing, which is likely to be on the London Stock Exchange. I would like to learn more than what little I know now, but I am interested in the company.

Some of the numbers, if true, are compelling. Earnings in 2005 were $3.9 billion vs $0.8 billion 2004. Revenue was $23.9 billion vs $5.3 billion in 2004. In 2005 the company reduced its debt by $1.7 billion down to $10.9 billion.

I would not get too excited about the growth built into those numbers because the old Yukos’ operations were severely hampered in 2004 and so the company did not do a lot that year.

Some other fun facts about Rosneft include, among Russian companies, it is 2nd in gas production, 8th in oil production, 7th in reserves, and first for oil refining capacity. With the IPO, the company plans to sell 1/3 of the company for about $20 billion. As the company is now state owned, I presume the 2/3rds not sold will be held by the government and possibly sold later.

A lot of people assign a risk to Russian shares because of the Yukos affair. While I certainly cannot say it won’t happen again I think it makes sense to believe that the Russian government does not want it to happen again. A second company being dismantled would probably cause a huge flight of foreign capital, much worse than Yukos. The country, I believe, wants to be a capitalist country with foreign investment.

It’s fair to say they are still learning about capitalism, but anything they do that jeopardizes foreign investment into the country is counter to their own interests. And it is worth pointing out that there are plenty of Russian companies traded on foreign exchanges in the US and in Europe.

Russia wants to be more important in the world economy — not less. Between now and the listing date there will be a lot more to read about Rosneft before making any kind of decision.


[composed and posted with
ecto]


Technorati Tags: , , ,

No comments: